9/25/2023 0 Comments Fl studio price rant![]() ![]() QUICK UPDATE: I got my hands on this lens the other day and give a few impressions.īelow is the official press release from Nikon USA. On top of that we need another 70-200 in our video kit any way so…. What I will say is I will be testing it and that will determine if I will replace my current one or not. Will I be buying it? I want to buy it because I like to have the newest and sharpest glass possible but man oh man is it expensive. Only using it will determine this for me. I have not seen another lens that does this and i’m not sure if this will be more stable / balanced or totally awkward. Reduces CA and has it almost eliminates all distortion.Ī major design change that i’m not sure sure about just yet was the decision to move the zoom ring to where the focus ring used to be and the focus ring to where the zoom ring used to be. I am sure this will be a sharp, fast focusing and all around amazing lens but it’s priced at a point that only the full time pros can afford. If SIGMA comes out with a SPORTS 70-200 2.8 I would have a hard time telling someone to spend $2,800 on the Nikon over the SIGMA. I don’t care how amazing this lens is, it’s a hard pill to swallow.Īt a price like this I think SIGMA has a golden opportunity to release a 70-200 2.8 OS SPORT lens for somewhere around $1500. It’s $500 more expensive then it should have been and it’s hard to recommend this to someone who’s just starting out. What exactly do I mean “priced NOT TO SELL”? I mean this lens is way to expensive at $2,799.95. Im not exactly sure what Nikon was thinking when they decided to price this lens NOT TO SELL. ![]() What Was Nikon Thinking? Nikon 70-200 2.8E FL ED VR Lens Preview / Rant: Priced NOT TO SELL MEGA HUGE Portable Power And More Paper: Postman FRO. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |